mirror of
https://github.com/TerryCavanagh/VVVVVV.git
synced 2026-01-30 01:48:15 +03:00
Explicitly declare void for all void parameter functions (#628)
Apparently in C, if you have `void test();`, it's completely okay to do `test(2);`. The function will take in the argument, but just discard it and throw it away. It's like a trash can, and a rude one at that. If you declare it like `void test(void);`, this is prevented. This is not a problem in C++ - doing `void test();` and `test(2);` is guaranteed to result in a compile error (this also means that right now, at least in all `.cpp` files, nobody is ever calling a void parameter function with arguments and having their arguments be thrown away). However, we may not be using C++ in the future, so I just want to lay down the precedent that if a function takes in no arguments, you must explicitly declare it as such. I would've added `-Wstrict-prototypes`, but it produces an annoying warning message saying it doesn't work in C++ mode if you're compiling in C++ mode. So it can be added later.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -8,25 +8,25 @@
|
||||
class textboxclass
|
||||
{
|
||||
public:
|
||||
textboxclass();
|
||||
textboxclass(void);
|
||||
|
||||
void centerx();
|
||||
void centerx(void);
|
||||
|
||||
void centery();
|
||||
void centery(void);
|
||||
|
||||
void adjust();
|
||||
void adjust(void);
|
||||
|
||||
void initcol(int rr, int gg, int bb);
|
||||
|
||||
void setcol(int rr, int gg, int bb);
|
||||
|
||||
void update();
|
||||
void update(void);
|
||||
|
||||
void remove();
|
||||
void remove(void);
|
||||
|
||||
void removefast();
|
||||
void removefast(void);
|
||||
|
||||
void resize();
|
||||
void resize(void);
|
||||
|
||||
void addline(std::string t);
|
||||
public:
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user